Featured cases
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Tenneco 1995
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Smith & Nephew 2003
![]() 2003 ![]() old logo A classic case of restaging the corporate brand, by CEO Christopher O'Donnell, both to refocus and to refresh the business. Over several years, the company had stripped down from 'medical conglomerate' to focus on its three medical devices businesses; these in turn needed to coalesce more clearly in a common brand. That's the 'focus' part; add 'refresh,' the opportunity to stimulate both customers and employees with an expression of enthusiastic energy. The rebranding reinforced a restructuring into three newly defined sectors, and replacement of all unit and product logos with monolithic umbrella branding. And to help reinforce a common culture, a worldwide refurbishment of architectural interiors was designed. Tony Spaeth CREDITS Wolff Olins CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 16/01/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
| Strategic driver: 100% | |||
|
Narrow the scope Express a more specific focus | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
| x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
| x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
| x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
|
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
| x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
| x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
| x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
| x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Architecture | ||
|
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 40% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
| x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
| x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
| x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
|
Change perceived composition Redefine the defining units | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list |
| x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
| x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
|
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
| x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
| x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
| x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Architecture | ||

