Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Vantiv 2011
This rebranding was set in motion in 2009, when Fifth Third Bank sold a controlling interest in its Processing Solutions unit (a banking 'back room' operation, handling card and ATM transaction processing on a global basis) to Advent International, who are aggressive equity investors on a global scale. (At $2.35 billion, this was one of the largest private equity transactions completed in 2009.) In all but name, this was a spin-out. Obviously, its parental branding had become a net liability. Fifth Third is regional while Vantiv's prospective market is global (and includes banks competitive to Fifth Third). Perhaps more importantly, Vantiv operates in a dynamic, rapidly growing technology-driven sector (consider payment by smart phone) and needs a brand that supports a more dynamic culture than that of a bank. Finally, CEO Charles Drucker and his team were quietly working toward an IPO (as confirmed by July 12 Wall Street Journal reporting), for which a more forward-looking freestanding identity would be essential. CEO Drucker's rebranding team found their way to the San Francisco office of Landor Associates, and to strategist Bob Kersten and creative director Chris Lehmann. According to Kersten, Landor recommended a positioning which would replace employees' "we've been spun away" dejection with a winner's attitude, active and progressive, distanced from financial services, closer to Silicon Valley than to banking. The subsequent naming process was then straightforward and led logically to the figurative coined word Vantiv...short, unique, with positive connotations ("advantage") and a marvelous symmetry of v's... and best of all, legally available. With a sharp short name, who needs a symbol? Landor's early logo preference was for a wordmark, lower-casing the initial v to celebrate the v-v symmetry and to give the mark a pleasing boat shape. Symbol ideas, initial cap solutions and all-cap solutions were explored too, but the client readily accepted the case for a wordmark (bolstered by examples like Microsoft, 3M and in Vantiv's space, Bloomberg). The case for a simple wordmark was also strengthened by Landor's recommended addition of a visual system featuring a "symbol stream" of icons (product, function or market-related), to be used alone or in dynamic random patterns, plus a rich color palette featuring yellow, purple and three shades of gray. The recommended corporate font is Foundry Context, which was also the basis of the redrawn wordmark (note shorter comb-over on the a, deleted serif on the t, and enlarged tilde on the i, which relates to the icon dot shapes). Thus Vantiv is yet another example in the trend toward visual identities shaped as much or more by secondary graphic devices than by the logos themselves. Signature system: Mixed. While most operations will be Vantiv-branded, some will continue to be served with a Fifth Third face and newly acquired businesses may at first be verbally endorsed, "a Vantiv business." A change of HQ location (vacating Fifth Third property for its own location, though still in Cincinnati) also has rebranding impact. Launch planning was timed to coordinate with the move, and at Landor's suggestion, architectural elements were retrofitted to incorporate branding elements. The new brand was launched first to 80 senior employees, in a half-day portion of a management off-site (the room was re-dressed during a break); attendees, now Vantiv brand champions, then participated in a later all-employee launch event..
CREDITS Landor SF CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 28/07/2011 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Structural driver: 40% | |||
Spinout or de-acquisition Express a new vision | 40% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: HQ Location | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Strategic driver: 55% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting geographic association | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: HQ Location | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: HQ Location | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: HQ Location | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Functional driver: 5% | |||
Name weakness Increase name impact & recall | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||