Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Sensata Technologies 2006
2006 This is a spinout. For three billion dollars, Bain Capital bought the Sensors & Controls business (essentially the 'instruments' piece) of Texas Instruments, to create a more focused global leader in this industrial (with a tech edge) category. Landor's namers played with every possible outgrowth of 'sensor' and its Latin root 'sensus,' feeling/sense. They found "Sensata," original and just odd enough to be available. The word Technologies was tacked on to reinforce diversity and more importantly, to add some hardness to an otherwise soft, even feminine-sounding name. The design solution is simply s-e-n-s-a-t-a, written in Braille, punched up with colors to suggest diversity of markets and applications. According to designer Nicolas Aparicio, Braille has relevance in suggesting a passion to resolve customer problems and the cool-gray-to-hot-red color flow suggests "giving life to machines." (Process trivia: the Landor team never met their clients in person. Interviews, reviews of name lists, design presentations... all via conference call.) The April 27 launch of the new brand coincided neatly with the spin-out transaction, and birth of the new company: that takes planning, probably some late hours, and good fortune in the legal name clearance process. Tony Spaeth
CREDITS Landor NY CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 13/11/2006 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Structural driver: 100% | |||
Spinout or de-acquisition Express a new vision | 100% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Created words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||