Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: McGladrey 2010
McGladrey is actually two companies, united by a partnership agreement – RSM McGladrey, a subsidiary of H&R Block, and partner-owned McGladrey & Pullen. H&R Block describes RSM McGladrey as "a professional services firm consulting mid-size organizations. The company offers wealth management, retirement resources, business and tax consulting, investment banking, and international business services." (The RSM in its name indicates its membership in RSM International, a network of independent accounting firms in which it is the U.S. representative.) Essentially, the new McGladrey brand expresses the two firms' December, 2009 agreement to join in "an alternative practice structure." Combined, they are the fifth largest U.S. provider of accounting, tax and consulting services, a competitor to the likes of Price Waterhouse and Accenture. "We were our industry's best-kept secret" said Mark Audino, formerly a consultant to RSM McGladrey, who came on board just six months ago as Chief Marketing Officer. "It was like owning a Ferrari stuck in first gear." The rebranding was therefore designed to make "McGladrey" unmistakably visible, expressing its joint presence as a significant player. FutureBrand provided the symbol-dominant logo, designing the symbol to be distinctive but purely abstract (or does it evoke a landscape, perhaps a golf course? Internally, it's been called "the Rothko bars.") Kass Uehling later refined the mark (notably the color palette) and designed the application system. It will be the signature (monolithic) in all unit's communications. There is also a unifying tagline, "Experience the power of being understood." To further express its "big leagues" positioning, McGladrey has plunged into pro golf sponsorship, like competitors KPMG and Accenture, and will now be a significant and sustained advertiser. Summary of driver ratings estimates: CREDITS FutureBrand (logo concept) and Kass Uehling (refinement and implementation) CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 5/07/2010 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Structural driver: 5% | |||
Merger & Acquisition Merger of equals; best of both | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Strategic driver: 70% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Enhance size perception | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 40% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Functional driver: 25% | |||
Name weakness Increase name impact & recall | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||