Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Kemper 2011
![]() ![]() ![]() Rarely does a business fail, while its name retains enough positive equity to attract an acquirer. Kemper, a once solid, nationally-known US commercial insurer ran into financial difficulties during 2002 (according to Wikipedia) after new management took it into new areas of business which performed poorly. As a mutual company, it was limited in its ability to raise new capital and eventually failed to do so. The company stopped writing new policies and entered runoff, and in 2002 Unitrin (a 1990 spin-out from the breakup of Teledyne) bought Kemper's personal insurance businesses (life, home, auto) for which it leased the Kemper name. Having no love for "Unitrin," a cold and artificial construction, Unitrin's leaders began to see in "Kemper" a stronger brand platform for the kind of company they increasingly envisioned no longer a holding company, now a unified insurance provider, and a powerbrand. Said CEO Donald Southwell, "Since the Kemper acquisition, we have looked for opportunities to leverage the value of the Kemper brand throughout our organization. When we had the opportunity to purchase the name outright in mid-2010, we jumped on it. The Kemper name fits who we have become as a company. It allows us to bring together all of our approximately 7,000 employees under one banner. The drivers, in summary, are estimated as 10% functional (relative functional weakness of the Unitrin name), and 90% strategic -- Brand architecture is at present Mixed, in that Unitrin-branded units temporarily retain their Unitrin signatures endorsed only verbally as Kemper companies, while Kemper-unit signatures incorporate the new symbol. But a relatively rapid transition (another year?) to monolithic Kemper signatures is planned, backed by umbrella brand advertising. (Only one unit had to make an immediate name change; the Kemper unit became Kemper Preferred.) Launch communications focused on the August 25 NYSE opening bell ceremony, a full-page WSJ ad and a feature article in the (home-town) Chicago Tribune. More importantly, sustained advertising will mark the shift from quiet holding company to a more aggressive brand-driven insurance provider. We view our rebranding as an investment in the company, said Dennis Vigneau, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Over time we expect to see benefits in terms of overall growth and increased shareholder returns. Adds Diana Hickert-Hill, newly appointed VP IR and CI, "To give voice to our brand is inspirational." CREDITS Lippincott CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 1/09/2011 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 90% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Functional driver: 10% | |||
Name weakness Increase name impact & recall | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||