Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: DSM 2011
![]() ![]() It's hard to find a more comprehensively planned and confidently launched rebranding than this one, used by a leader to consolidate and communicate change. In 2007, when Feike Sijbesma became its CEO, DSM was "an inward-looking chemical company; gray, very Dutch, and compared to the DuPonts and BASFs, a minor player," according to Jos van Haastrecht, Director of Company Branding. Sijbesma led a comprehensive corporate restructuring, to focus more narrowly on two higher-margin growth segments, Life Sciences and Materials Sciences, in which DSM could more credibly aspire to leadership positions (a change, in effect, of industry definition). Twelve business units, generically named and now monolithically DSM-branded, are grouped in four clusters, whose names become the company's defining competence list -- Nutrition, Pharma, Performance Materials and Polymer Intermediates. Restructuring was accompanied by a sweeping cultural initiative, "the DSM Change Agenda," to instill desired behaviors and values (such as external focus, accountability, diversity, inspirational leadership, and unification) in support of a new common societal mission – "to create brighter lives for people today and for generations to come." CEO Sijbesma understood that restructuring, without rebranding, may be
tentative and incomplete (because seeing is believing; change which can be seen
is more certain). He asked Angelique Paulussen, SVP Corporate
Communications, to lead his rebranding team, assisted by Branding Director Jos
van Haastrecht (for whom this was a full-time 30-month assignment). The program
team chose Coley Porter Bell, identity specialists within Ogilvy's London
office, for identity and creative counsel. Their contributions included Launch messaging makes it clear that the rebranding is seen by DSM as the culminating act of its entire transformation process. "Identity, strategy, culture – all these come together in our new brand – it is one of our most important tools supporting our corporate strategy. For our internal community, the new brand will serve as a binding force." The launch was unusually aggressive. On 16 February, 23,000 employees worldwide received special-event invitations. They saw a 45-minute film in which a fictional reporter travelled the world to investigate the DSM story; then they each received a copy of "Global Times," the resulting publication, to take home with them. Employees were further impressed, a week later, when they saw the public campaign (by McCann Erickson) launched with large-space ads in newspapers and business journals worldwide, backed up with outdoor billboards and posters in major airports. In sum, this identity program applies the full set of visual tools plus tag lines, signature system, industry definition and competence list, a behavioural change "agenda" and a high-visibility change event, to a broad spectrum of strategic purposes. Company Branding Director van Haastrecht concurs with the driver weightings below. CREDITS Coley Porter Bell CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 15/03/2011 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 100% | |||
Change direction Redefine industry or core competence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Competence list | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Narrow the scope Express a more specific focus | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines |
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Competence list | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Competence list | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||