Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Polycom 2012
![]() ![]() This is another instance of reputation, in conflict with vision... the Polycom is a competitor to Cisco in the conferencing hardware, software and services space. From its founding, in 1990, it has focused on voice, video and data, considered the three pillars of its 'unified communications' promise. Indeed the "poly" in its name, and the design of its symbol (three triangles, on a larger triangle), were intended to support that three-fold offering. Then success happened, and distorted this branding intent. Polycom's triangular "SoundStation" conference phones earned a central presence in conference rooms worldwide (4 million have been shipped). This extraordinary logo exposure has nailed the Polycom image to voice-related hardware. (It didn't help that the logo and product's sharing of "triangle" reinforced this limiting association.) In May 2010, Andy Miller assumed leadership as CEO. To respond to the new world of mobile devices, multiple platforms and the cloud, he was determined that Polycom must step up its game in software-based video collaboration and data-intensive solutions. He sensed the current brand image had become a real barrier to this vision, internally as well as externally putting a dampener on employee aspirations as well as on customer and investor expectations. To help address these issues he recruited a brand-savvy Chief Marketing Officer, Kate Hutchison, who in turn engaged John McNeil Studios; "We needed messaging, great storytelling as well as design" Kate told me, "and they're good writers." O'Neil confirms that "Kate wanted a different kind of identity process -- core-values-based, collaborative and advertising-oriented." McNeil crafted a new brand promise -- "To create experiences that push the greatness of collaboration forward," that appealed to the leadership team as an employee rallying cry. "Our first audience for this effort is our 4,000 employees, worldwide" said Hutchison. "Their excitement with how they spend their working lives, for Polycom's impact on the world, is mission critical." The design strategies, then (per designer Kim Le Liboux): The new logo features a three-ring symbol, which is also used as a super-graphic in the visual system (with a palette of muted grays, and sans serif typography). The new brand was unveiled in April for 2,000 sales leaders and key partners at Polycom's annual TEAM Polycom event, and then at region-by-region employee meetings, the last timed to coincide with the opening of new a (architecturally advanced) corporate headquarters building in San Jose, California. The rebranding has been received, Hutchison reports, with a mix of enthusiasm and "it's about time." Hopefully investors, too, are seeing in this rebranding a game-changing shift of culture and strategy, not just logo. Analyst Zeus Kerravala certainly gets it, having blogged that "the new logo is nice but I really like the shift to a software oriented company... I am of the opinion that the company is no longer content to be an alternative provider and wants to be in control of its own future." CREDITS John McNeil Studio, Berkely, California CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 9/06/2012 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 100% | |||
Change direction Redefine industry or core competence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Architecture | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Architecture | ||